I did not expect anything to Bagnasco, so the style curial statement that everything suggests that from a blow to the rim and a barrel with the only real negative opinion reserved for judges, did not surprise me.
But the Vatican does nothing at all: a very sensitive treatment has certainly had a very high price.
The payment is in the final text on the municipal federalism (which - for some time - seems to be the only future solution to all these problems). In that text, presented a few days ago by Calderoli (which has been proven as a legislator with the current electoral law "crap"), the ' IMU , single tax on real estate, which will replace the ICI in 2014 and triggered , the less will have to pay all the Catholic Church.
No taxation not only on place of worship and properties owned by the Holy See, but also for hospitals and clinics, private schools, hotels and guest speakers. Despite Italy is the European Union on trial for these state aid, have been reintroduced the same exemptions already provided by ICI and not present in previous drafts.
good old times with St. Peter we railed against ethical relativism: avran now thought that those who betray their faith for 30 denarii worth a bad end, but when it comes to not paying property taxes on one hundred thousand, that's the speech you do differently ....
------------------------------------
One thing led to another, so let me propose a thought, especially to those who continue to worry about my soul, so maybe you are distracted in some ';-)
Roberta de Monticelli A " time ago, "said among other things that" save his soul, always follow the rules from time to time the spiritual leader, the priest and so on, there is no great merit, but not a great risk there's nothing of the great epic of the individual Christian life. "
but admitted that the method can work, and that a life of unquestioning obedience to the Catholic church could open the door of paradise.
For many it could be a bargain (much better than it might be for others to rely blindly on Berlusconi's words). A quiet parentheses earth, topped by some peccadillo forgivable in the manner prescribed, to switch to a bright eternity.
The question that I want to ask about the possibility that the guide (although it claims to be infallible) would have deviated and instead move into a test now completely divergent from the original ultimate goal.
If so, what they will say these faithful and obedient subjects of the day? They've been deceived? What went wrong without meaning to? That they are not guilty because they have always let others decide for them? Who taught him to be so small you had to do? That they all do well? Who were convinced that self-determination was a blasphemy? And he persuaded others to do the same mistake as it will be assessed?
There is a risk in that lifestyle choice, a very high risk because at stake is eternity.
let me know
0 comments:
Post a Comment